Illustration for: Netflix Weighs Opening Its App to Rival Streamers

Netflix Weighs Opening Its App to Rival Streamers

Netflix is reportedly considering letting other streaming services sell inside its app, a shift from walled garden toward distribution platform.

TC
By the Markets Desk
Edited by Trace Cohen · Early-stage VC & angel · Founder, New York Venture Partners
1 min read
ShareXLinkedInEmail

THE RUNDOWN

1

Netflix is reportedly considering opening its app to other streamers, [The Verge reported](https://www.theverge.com/streaming/983741/netflix-open-app-peacock-fox-one)

2

Becoming the storefront for competitors is a different business than selling subscriptions -- it means taking a distribution cut

3

Amazon Prime Video Channels and Roku already run this model profitably, which is the template Netflix would be adopting

4

It signals that subscriber growth alone no longer carries the story, and aggregation economics do

TC

The VC Read · Trace's Take

Trace Cohen

Aggregation is the highest-margin position in any consumer category and the hardest to be granted voluntarily. If Netflix pulls this off it earns a Roku-style take rate on top of its own subscriptions, which is a real re-rating case. The signal to watch is whether any scaled service signs -- Peacock alone is a pilot, Disney would be a business.

Analysis

Netflix is weighing whether to let other streaming services be sold and watched inside its own app, The Verge reported, with Peacock and Fox One named among possible partners.

The strategic logic is aggregation. Amazon has run Prime Video Channels for years, collecting a share of every subscription sold through it, and Roku built a business on being the neutral place viewers start. Both make money on distribution regardless of which service a viewer chooses. Netflix has spent two decades doing the opposite -- owning the direct relationship, the billing, and increasingly the content itself.

Both make money on distribution regardless of which service a viewer chooses.

The shift, if it happens, is an acknowledgment that the growth phase of direct subscription is over in mature markets and the remaining upside is in capturing a slice of everyone else's revenue. It also raises the switching cost for a customer who has consolidated their entire video spend into one interface, which is worth more than any individual show.

The complication is that competitors would be handing Netflix their customer relationship and their churn data, which is precisely what Disney and Warner have resisted with Amazon. Smaller services with weak direct acquisition economics have every reason to say yes; the ones with scale have every reason to say no, and their absence would make the storefront materially less useful.

ShareXLinkedInEmail

Key Sources

2 sources

Reported by The Verge · Analysis by Value Add Pulse.

← Back to Pulse

THE WIRE in your inbox— Tech, startup & VC news with Trace's take. Free, no spam.